{"id":2904,"date":"2022-09-14T12:58:54","date_gmt":"2022-09-14T10:58:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sonofcarey.com\/?p=2904"},"modified":"2022-09-14T12:58:57","modified_gmt":"2022-09-14T10:58:57","slug":"a-review-of-the-advertising-copy-of-women-and-the-gender-of-god","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sonofcarey.com\/?p=2904","title":{"rendered":"A Review of the Advertising Copy of Women and the Gender of God"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Eerdman\u2019s has decided to publish <a href=\"https:\/\/www.eerdmans.com\/Products\/7909\/women-and-the-gender-of-god.aspx\">a book in October 2022<\/a> which if it accurately delivers what it promises in its advertising copy will immediately serve <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sonofcarey.com\/?p=2500\">feminism<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sonofcarey.com\/?p=2684\">multiculturalism<\/a> while laying the groundwork for further false teachers to promote <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sonofcarey.com\/?p=1658\">sodomy<\/a> and transgenderism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Here are the words they are using to sell the book with some comments added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The first line:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p><strong>A robust theological argument against the assumption that God is male.<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>God is masculine. That is no mere assumption, but the declaration of any one who can read grammar. In Hebrew, the word \u201cGod\u201d is masculine from the first verse of Genesis. God\u2019s final act of creation was \u201cman\u201d not persons because Adam stood for Eve before they were even dignified with names. \u201cHe\u201d is used exclusively throughout the entire Bible to describe God or any of the divine persons because the Holy Spirit wanted to use \u201cHe\u201d and never \u201cshe.\u201d God has chosen His pronouns as \u201cHe\u201d, \u201cHim\u201d, and \u201cUs.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>There are no robust arguments against God\u2019s Word. And God\u2019s revelation is never merely an assumption. Wrong on both parts of this subtitle.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p>God values women.<\/p><p>While many Christians would readily affirm this truth, the widely held assumption that the Bible depicts a male God persists\u2014as it has for centuries.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>First, the author might have skipped a couple sessions in her gender studies class and tried to catch up on basic logic. Or perhaps Eerdman\u2019s thinks its readers can\u2019t spot a false dilemma. But as the copy reminds us, \u201cmany Christians\u201d have readily affirmed \u201cfor centuries\u201d that the church has taught <em>both<\/em> that God values women and that God is masculine. If their advertising reflects the content, then we should expect logical fallacies like false dilemmas and begging the question (3<sup>rd<\/sup> paragraph, \u201cGod is never sexualized by biblical writers\u2026\u201d) along with other related fallacies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Second, the author is opposing the way all exegetes of any note from the early church, the Reformation, the Puritans, the Missionary movement, and the Methodist revivals have always understood the Bible until 1950 or so. But what is a little thing like thousands of years of church tradition which lines up with the clear statement of Scripture when we have a politically correct, Satanic, ideology to promote?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p>Through a deep reading of the incarnation narratives of the New Testament and other relevant scriptural texts, Amy Peeler shows how the Bible depicts a God beyond gender and a savior who, while embodied as a man, is the unification in one person of the image of God that resides in both male and female.\u00a0<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>The argument comes from a \u201cdeep reading\u201d and it \u201cgoes beneath the surface\u201d (3<sup>rd<\/sup> paragraph) to attack \u201cthe destructive idolatry of masculinity.\u201d In the reviews it is called daring, controversial, and a work that dismantles the patriarchy. These are some of the terms\u2014along with others in this brief collection of oozing words\u2014that smell like people who see errors in Scripture, prefer churches with topical homilies rather than verse by verse teaching, and are in lock step with the Cultural Marxists permeating evangelicalism. The Biblical truth has been firmly believed for centuries as the first paragraph states, but another review writes that the Bible\u2019s plain teaching which has been held up by the entire church is \u201cabsurd.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The table of contents reveals that the author is trying desperately to disconnect masculinity from its clear source in the Godhead: Chapter 1 \u201cThe Father Who is Not Male\u201d and chapter 4 \u201cGod is Not Masculine.\u201d If someone hated Biblical manhood, if he wanted to overthrow male headship, if he despised Paul\u2019s words in 1 Tim. 2:11-15, if he secretly loved feminism, and if he also wanted to infiltrate the church, these are the kinds of words he would use.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Seven reviewers are included below, but Eerdmans thought it best not to let John MacArthur or Voddie Baucham or Doug Wilson have a say. \u201cWhat do these men know? They have only taught the Bible, and evangelized sinners, and led local churches where angels gathered to watch every seven days. Let us put up reviewers who sit in the chairs of the academy! The altered state we feel when PhD\u2019s praise us is our wine of choice.\u201d Were the 6 out of 7 reviewer women chosen because they have raised godly children and persevered in faith, love, and holiness (1 Tim. 2:15) or because they have done such a superlative job keeping the home (Tit. 2:5)? They would be insulted if they even read this paragraph, and yet the Holy Spirit says those are the marks of great women. These kinds of people do not like those kinds of words.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>And that is why it is hard to imagine Peeler or the reviewers or the publishers as members in John Bunyan\u2019s church or Spurgeon\u2019s or Wesley\u2019s or Lloyd-Jones\u2019 or any God-fearing assembly that breathes after the fear of God and revival.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The advertising copy and the reviews make this work look like another man-hating, feminist-promoting, CNN-approved attempt to distance the church from the word of Scripture and its historic faith. Charles Templeton, Joshua Harris, and Abraham Piper will probably see this book as a step in the right direction.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Eerdman\u2019s has decided to publish a book in October 2022 which if it accurately delivers what it promises in its advertising copy will immediately serve feminism and multiculturalism while laying the groundwork for further false teachers to promote sodomy and &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sonofcarey.com\/?p=2904\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[2,11],"tags":[206],"class_list":["post-2904","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-book-reviews","category-pastoral","tag-book-reviews-2"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p3QrZa-KQ","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sonofcarey.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2904","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sonofcarey.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sonofcarey.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sonofcarey.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sonofcarey.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2904"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.sonofcarey.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2904\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2905,"href":"https:\/\/www.sonofcarey.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2904\/revisions\/2905"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sonofcarey.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2904"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sonofcarey.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2904"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sonofcarey.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2904"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}