The Temptation of Eve Is Really About Legalism?

Recently Crossway’s blog published some of Sinclair Ferguson’s reflections on legalism.

A friend of mine passed on the link and here is some of the correspondence that followed.

Good morning, Brother,

Thank you for passing this link on to me. Three thoughts come to mind as I read that post.

1. All sins are related.
Haven’t we both heard people say that the ultimate sin that all sins root back to is… Pride (a preacher I once heard). Or Selfishness (a preacher I once heard). Or Autonomy (Frame). Or Idolatry (Keller). Because Jesus summarized the whole law as love God and love your neighbor, there is a valid tendency for us to systematize—which merely means combine some ideas and divide others—all the verses of the Bible. It’s a valid practice because our Lord did it, but also because our own hearts have experienced the web that produced our spiritual failures.

So, in that sense, I agree with Ferguson.

2. His choice of legalism was somewhat arbitrary.
The act of systematizing is a moral choice. There is a reason why this author and this blog at this time chose to combine those two ideas. He could have written a post (or chapter) from that same text (Gen. 3) critiquing antinomianism and evangelical scholarship.

“Eve didn’t want God’s law [antinomianism]. She rather chose to place her confidence in some other authority, just like many of the PhD’s at Wheaton College.”

Or, he could have chosen to aim at antinomianism and sinful entertainment from the account with Eve.

“Eve didn’t want God’s law [antinomianism] because she was so fascinated with personal satisfaction. Her eyes were bewitched, her senses were excited, and her hope for pleasure outgrew her humility.”

Or, he could have chosen to aim at antinomianism and egalitarianism.

“Eve didn’t want God’s law [antinomianism], which brought her necessarily outside the federal headship God had provided for her. Adam also bears blame because he should have been helping and guarding. But ultimately, Eve’s initiating leadership was the opposite of what God had made her to do and it was the natural fruit of her own rejection of God’s law.”

I’m not arguing for any of those presentations, although I think we could. Rather, I want it to be clear that the examples I just gave and that could easily be multiplied are in the same category as the two ideas Ferguson brought together and Crossway chose to highlight. That is, they and all the New Calvinists with them don’t like restrictions on their cultural pursuits. So, they chose to take a swing at legalism again—after all who wants to support something like that?—because they have moral reasons behind it. They feel very strongly about what they perceive to be behind that word. Notice that they at least tossed out a cursory definition of antinomianism (“opposition to and breach of the law”), but they don’t even need to define legalism because its “so obvious to everyone.”

They chose to put that term in the post because they wanted to make that point, not because they were neutrally bound by the text alone.

3. When evangelicals use the word “legalism,” I have good reason to suspect that they are hiding their antinomianism.
Precious few are the New Calvinists who will rebuke a leading scholar from Trinity for humorous remarks he made at a pastor’s conference about how he and all the other pastors present watched the movie Titanic. Where are the evangelicals who will rebuke the blatant worldliness of so many CCM artists? Though Kevin De Young wrote a book about holiness, The Gospel Coalition and WORLD magazine continue to write movie reviews because they know evangelicals consume those products. Wheaton College’s newspaper called a young boy a “missionary” to Hollywood because he was a model, and not surprisingly, he has since been seen in photos with nudity. Robert Webber at an evangelistic Bible study that my friend set up (and at which I was in attendance) waxed on and off about legalism while using the F-word.

These examples are only the beginning of my file full of evangelicals and their ongoing disregard for God’s law. So when they say legalism, I hear, “denying contemporary popular culture and entertainment.” Sadly, my experience has shown that is the one heresy with which no truly evangelical church will compromise. To the average evangelical “I hate legalism” means “Don’t touch my lifestyle.” If they really want to defend justification, they should try living holy lives.

Is that cynicism or just Biblical wisdom? If John the Baptist were alive, the blogs would be overflowing with posts about a professing, popular preacher who is cynical and ungracious and legalistic, yet Jesus praised him.

I would enjoy hearing your thoughts as well even if you disagree. I trust that you can see my conclusions rest on some level of evidence, so feel free to deal with that evidence if I have somehow missed something vital.

May God grant us both more of that holiness without which no man will see the Lord.

Seth

Other posts on legalism:Putting Legalism to Good Use
Good Works Aren’t All Bad

 

Posted in Inconsistency, Pastoral | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Sale: 80 Years of Salvation on Clearance!

Here is a picture I took recently at a Muslim shop. If you can’t see the text:

A Toy Salvation for Pretend Sinners“(Recite 80 times)

In the name of Allah (S. W. T.), the Beneficient, the Merciful

80 Years of Sins Forgiven

Rasulullah (S. A. W.) has said, “One who recites the following Durood Shareff after Asr Salaah on a Friday without moving from his place, will have 80 years of his sins forgiven and He will receive the Reward of 80 Years Ibaaadah.”

No one who has felt the weight of sin and the terror of Hell could be satisfied with a salvation that could be found that simply.

Posted in Rewarding mediocrity | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Africa is Reached With This “Gospel”

As I returned from preaching in the village, a man struck up a conversation with me as he was selling watermelons from his bakkie on the side of the road. Here is the conversation as I recorded just moments after it happened.

Pastor: Are you the pastor at Elim?

Seth: Yes, sir, and are you also a pastor?

Pastor: Yes, my church is in Nzhelele.

Seth: Are you one of those pastors who loves money?

Pastor: I am trying to point people to Jesus.

Seth: …but do you love money?

Pastor: Yes, I love money…

Seth: …but Paul says we must not love money, it is the root of all evil.

Pastor: [With rising heat] Do you think this is the way a man of God should live by selling melons on the side of the road?  it is not nice for a pastor to be poor and to be selling watermelons like I am on the side of the road.

Seth: Why not? Paul was poor and Jesus was poor?

Pastor: no, he was not. He was rich.

Seth: The Bible says in Timothy 6 that if you love money you are opening the door to all kinds of sins. You will be pierced by many sorrows and will lose your soul. You said you love money didn’t you?

Pastor: Yes, I do love money because you have to have money to live.

Seth: We’re not talking about using money wisely, I asked if you love it. And you said you did. On the authority of the Bible, you are a false pastor and in great danger.

Pastor: [Perturbed] Go well.

This particular pastor has a vehicle with white lettering all over it and Christian messages. There’s rural African Christianity. Please pray for a revival and send your best men as reinforcements.

Other evidences you may find interesting:
Selling the blood of Jesus

Dancing on money at church

Full of Covetousness

Conversation with a Venda “Christian”

Incriminating Photos

Observations from a Recent Crusade in Our Village

Posted in Accounts of African Religion, Prosperity gospel | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Signs of the Times

These signs are directly across the street from each other. At the church faith is optional, and the other demonstrates the real pride government employees take in their work.

Belief is optional.

Belief is optional.

IMG_0744

This is what government development looks like.

Though the strains of the virus are different, I diagnose both institutions as afflicted with the same disease.

The bottom line of the church sign says,
“Where you can belong before you believe”

The other says,
Limpopo Provincial Government
Department of Finance and Economic Development

Both are advertising that they have lost their way. And the solution to both problems is gospel repentance.

Posted in Inconsistency, Rewarding mediocrity | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Master the Arts for the Sake of the Church

At very least, Christians have to know music, poetry, rhetoric, and architecture. Music because we’re told to sing; poetry because we’re told to sing hymns, psalms, and spiritual songs; rhetoric because somebody’s got to preach; and architecture because we’ve got to meet somewhere.

David de Bruyn

Where are the master poets and architects in the church today?

Posted in Orthopathy, Pastoral, Quotes | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

From Whence the Baptists?

We believe that the Baptists are the original Christians. We did not commence our existence at the Reformation, we were Reformers before Luther and Calvin were born; we never came out of the Church of Rome, for we were never in it, but we have an unbroken line of succession up to the apostles themselves. We have always existed from the very days of Christ; and our principles, though sometimes veiled and forgotten, like a river which may travel underground for a little season, have always had honest and holy adherents. Persecuted alike by Romanists and Protestants of almost every sect, yet there has never existed a Government holding Baptist principles which has persecuted others; nor, I believe, has any body of Baptists ever held it to be right to put the consciences of others under the control of man. We have ever been ready to suffer, as our martyrologies will prove; but we are not willing, to accept any help from the State, or to prostitute the purity of the Bride of Christ by any alliance with earthly Governments.

C. H. Spurgeon, in a greeting to all the Baptist churches who gathered for the opening of the Metropolitan Tabernacle in 1861 (sermon #376)

Posted in Quotes | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Brief Introductions to Orthopathy

Three contemporary authors have helped me get a grip on right feeling and its applications in the church.

1. One of the 6 authors of A Conservative Christian Declaration is David de Bruyn who also wrote a 130-page book called Building Conservative Churches. In the back of that book is a great bibliography of recommended reading on orthopathy. I’ve got some of the books and hope to read through them slowly over the next few years. Mostly De Bruyn treats the practical side of beauty as it applies to the church. For example, he questions painting nurseries with Noah’s Ark cartoon giraffes when the Flood is a terrible description of judgment—a prefiguring of Hell.

2. Roger Scruton, Anglican philosopher who writes about beauty from a conservative perspective. Solid, but not much Bible. You can start with his excellent and short, Culture Counts. His long books are very heavy (like The Aesthetics of Music), but this one is readable. For example, what is culture? Scruton, “The collective pursuit of true judgment.” He also writes in the brief series, Beauty: A Very Short Introduction.

3. A third book deserves a recommendation, Why Johnny Can’t Sing Hymns by David Gordon. Again, it’s neither long nor heavy, and it nearly earned my book of the year for 2013. He says things like, How can we worship a God whose name is the Ancient of Days when we are frantically trying to chase everything new? Gordon’s website has some interesting articles, and he also writes at Second Nature.

These three books by a Baptist, Anglican, and Presbyterian respectively would be the first three recommendations I would make for someone who wants to grapple with beauty and culture especially as they relate to the forms of worship like music, clothes, architecture, language, and technology.

If you are looking for perspective, these men all stand in contrast to the contemporary view of culture homogenized in the Gospel Coalition and promoted by men like D. A. Carson and Tim Keller.

Since these three books are all short, it’s not a great commitment to work through any of them. De Bruyn (the Baptist) uses the most Bible, Gordon (the Presbyterian) uses history and theology, and Scruton (the Anglican) is mostly philosophy.

If we care about loving God, then we should care about what love is, and these men point us in the right direction.

Posted in Book reviews, Definitions, Multiculturalism, Orthopathy, Pastoral | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Similarity Between Hitler and Roosevelt

We may be sure that the characteristic blindness of the twentieth century–the blindness about which posterity will ask, “But how could they have thought that?”–lies where we have never suspected it, and concerns something about which there is untroubled agreement between Hitler and President Roosevelt or between Mr. H. G. Wells and Karl Barth. None of us can fully escape this blindness, but we shall certainly increase it, and weaken our guard against it, if we read only modern books.

C. S. Lewis

A few blindspots come to mind where Hitler and Roosevelt probably would have agreed:

1. Practice is more important than theory.
2. The new is better than the old.
3. Science has the answers for contemporary man.

Can you improve the list?

Posted in Quotes | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Prosperity Theology Affirmation and Denials

1.     On the definition of Christianity
We affirm that the Biblical gospel may be summarized as the message that Christ died to save us from the wrath of God.

We deny that the Biblical gospel may be summarized as the message that Christ died to save us from poverty.

2.     On the affections
We affirm that the Biblical gospel includes affections for Christ which means a warm heart toward His prophetic ministry whereby He teaches His people to hate their own sin, a devoted faith toward His priestly ministry whereby He atones for the sins of His people, and a submissive joy toward His kingly ministry whereby He rules them with His Word.

We deny that the Biblical gospel creates affections for money, health, or any other earthly comfort. We further deny that loving pleasure is fitting with the first great command to love the Lord our God with all our heart, soul, mind, and strength.

3.     On the Christian status of regions influenced by prosperity theology
We affirm that Christian missionary obedience is desperately needed in those areas of the developing world in Africa as well as in South America, India, and China that are heavily influenced by prosperity theology. We affirm the church’s responsibility to evangelize those holding to prosperity theology as they would any other false religion.

We deny that the prosperity gospel is sufficient Christian witness to raise any people group to the status of “reached” in the context of world missions.

4.     On the five “Sola” doctrines
We affirm that the Biblical gospel assumes and requires the five doctrines commonly known since the Reformation as the Five Solas: Scripture alone, faith alone, grace alone, Christ alone, and to God alone be glory.

We deny that any message that rejects, contradicts, or stands independent of the Five Solas is the Biblical gospel.

5.     On charismaticism
We affirm that the Biblical gospel may be held by brothers and sisters in Christ who also practice speaking in tongues, miracles, and prophecy so long as they love humility, repentance, Christ, and the Bible more than any earthly comfort.

We deny that the Biblical gospel may be held by the charismatic who uses miracles, tongues, and prophecy as a foundation on which to promote the doctrine of deification (the teaching that men are little gods) and its counterpart positive confession (the teaching that men can create reality with their words).

6.     On wealth creation
We affirm that the Biblical gospel creates wealth as the truth is believed and practiced for generations and so long as it is undisturbed by the sins of others including encroaching governments. We further affirm that God’s usual means for creating wealth is according to the ordinary means of providence and not according to miracles.

We deny that the Biblical gospel creates wealth miraculously or immediately or in such a way as to draw men’s hearts away from the glory of Heaven, the atonement of Christ, and the horror of their own sin.

7.     On preaching
We affirm that the glory of preaching is clearly explaining the Word of God such that men understand what God is saying and are prepared to leave their sin, draw near to Christ, or change their worldly thinking to conform to the mind of God.

We deny that preaching honors God when it is filled with unprepared shouting, religious slogans, or “God talk” styled so as to impress the hearers with the status of the speaker.

8.     On money
We affirm that the Bible speaks about money, that our use of money shows the love and direction of our hearts, and that money is necessary to live in the modern world.

We deny that sermons should repeatedly return to money as a standard motif for reflection on the Lord’s Day.

9.     On television and media
We affirm that the gospel may be communicated through television and media in a way that honors God, Christ, and Scripture. We further affirm, however, that the dominant presence in religious broadcasting is occupied by those who will hear our Lord’s words, “Depart from me, I never knew you.”

We deny that all popular preachers and ministries are men of God or even true Christians simply due to the facts that they are popular and call themselves Christian.

10.  On handling false teachers
We affirm that pastors, preachers, and authors should be held accountable for their faithfulness to the gospel such that if they deny, change, or consistently ignore the gospel they must be named publicly and avoided.

We deny that Christian love will silence the mouths of God’s people regarding the terrible wolves who are trying to devour and make merchandise of the church which he purchased with His blood.

11.  On Christian unity
We affirm that believers in the Lord Jesus Christ are spiritually unified and should be practically unified in purpose and fellowship as much as circumstances permit on the earth.

We deny that believers in the prosperity gospel are believers in the Lord Jesus Christ, nor, therefore, are they unified spiritually with any true believers.

Posted in Lists, Prosperity gospel | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Why Isn’t Homosexuality More Popular in Africa?

The majority of Africans live in the rural areas—about 60% or 700 millions. And in the rural areas, homosexuality is not common. I have never seen it though I lived in an African village for 9 years and still work in the rural areas. The Africans who live in the villages and with whom I have spoken are dogmatically opposed to it whether they are Christian or not. Uganda, a state with 84% rural population, has famously attempted to outlaw homosexuality.

Why is homosexuality so uncommon in the rural areas of Africa? Several answers may be offered, but they all point in the same direction. After the last reason, they will all bond together to form yet another reason to reject the short-sighted decision of the U.S. Supreme Court.

1.     Answer #1: It is uncommon because rural Africans oppose it.

Either this answer is true or false. If it is false, then our question is still unanswered and we can proceed to another option below. But if it is true, it does not help the discussion because we still have to ask, “Why is homosexuality not accepted by the average rural African?” Either way, this answer only pushes the argument elsewhere.

2.     Answer #2: It is uncommon because homosexuality reflects sensibilities from European and Western cultures.

Maybe someone would say, “It’s not part of their culture.” But if homosexuality is a genetic trait, then why would culture influence how consistently it shows up? I would agree that sodomy is not a part of African culture, yet eating, drinking, sleeping, and marriage are parts of African culture because these are natural. If homosexuality is also natural, why isn’t it seen in the villages of Africa?

Perhaps someone may reply that Africa’s primal patterns have been adjusted since the colonists forced Christianity on them. Maybe someone could say that in the past Africa had a significant homosexual presence, but Western Christian norms chased that away like all the game on the African veldt.

Conversations with numerous vakokwana (elderly people) in the villages show that they have never heard of homosexuality in the rural areas. Nor does African traditional religion have written texts that propose ethics of sexuality. More importantly however, fornication, adultery, and polygamy are all still common in the rural areas even after colonization and Christian missionary influence has left its superficial mark. So we can’t argue that Africans have a high moral standard imported by Western, imperial religion.

3.     Answer #3: It is uncommon because African culture does not provide fertile soil for homosexuality.

The poverty of rural Africa has not allowed luxury to the average man. Many live a hand-to-mouth existence where they have not been able to cultivate tastes that are common in Europe and the U.S. When you are focused on surviving, time, energy, or heart for a plush life are in short supply. Many areas of culture will only wilt and die under the life-strangling chill of poverty. The frozen atmosphere of want touches everything from classical music to hard liquor. Though Africans have the resources to play drums and brew a traditional beer, their circumstances could not produce violins, Jack Daniels, abortion, or bikinis. These things all require a level of leisure to invent and cultivate that African societies have traditionally lacked.

Homosexuality fits into this category. Africans in the rural areas have not developed this for the same reason that they have not pioneered child pornography. Though fornication and sexual sins are common, the average villager does not indulge in them to the same degree of comfort that those who live in the richer parts of the world do. Here men purchase prostitutes and pursue their lust in the bush like animals rather than hidden in comfortable hotels. Poverty highlights the depravity; wealth disguises the perversity.

But hidden away, and with expendable income, the cancer of sin can feed on the wealthy societies until their tolerance is so gorged that they will pay any price for new and more edgy experiences. Lusts, like muscles, get stronger after use. In the U.S., a relatively poor man can pamper every desire. Hungry, American? Salt, fat, and sugar are available at amazingly cheap prices. Hot? Electricity is ubiquitous and fans are dirt cheap if you somehow couldn’t afford air conditioning. Tired? Soft beds, clean sheets, and large homes are easier to attain than in rural Africa.

Nearly every physical desire we have can be satisfied as soon as it comes up—including natural urges for physical intimacy. From pictures and videos on phones, the desires are sated and glutted until they have ballooned way out of proportion. To further touch these grotesquely inflated desires some churches have even offered “sex sermons” while the world experiments with ever-new titillations, which of course, are actually as old as wealthy societies. If you struggle with same sex attraction, what role has the dominant culture around you played in expanding your threshold for stimulation? Is popular culture in the developed world known for denying itself any desire? We are responsible both for our decisions as well as for being aware of the spirit of the age in which we live.

Homosexuality is not common in Africa because it generally requires a level of wealth to produce the leisure that allows for sinful desires to press the furthest reaches of reprobation. Therefore, we should expect sinners with access to more wealth in America and the urban areas of Africa to have a higher instance of homosexuality over their rural counterparts in Africa because they can indulge their sinful natures in ways that the poor cannot.

The lack of this particular vice in poor areas of the world is one more echo of God’s law revealing itself in nature against homosexuality. Let all those who support it grapple with these facts of life—homosexuality is a sin only rich societies can afford. But not for long.

See also: Gay Marriage is Wrong Because Christianity is Right.

 

Posted in Inconsistency, Missions, Pastoral | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment