The anger of a meek man is like fire struck out of steel, hard to be got out, but when it is out, soon gone.
Matthew Henry, The Quest for Meekness and Quietness of Spirit
The anger of a meek man is like fire struck out of steel, hard to be got out, but when it is out, soon gone.
Matthew Henry, The Quest for Meekness and Quietness of Spirit
Last Lord’s Day I began working through 1 Corinthians. Here is the path we hope to trod over the next year or so.
Purpose statement:
• A correction of relational, sexual, ecclesiastical, and theological problems that all churches might face
1. Acts 18:1-11 God saves people with problems.
2. 1:1-9 What to say before a rebuke
3. 1:10-16 Politics in the church
4. 1:17-25 An intellectual battle
5. 1:26-31 God chooses unlikely things
6. 2:1-5 Solus Christus in the pulpit
7. 2:6-16 Total inability
8. 3:1-4 Carnal Christians
9. 3:5-9 Christianity as farming
10. 3:10-15 Building for a reward
11. 3:16-23 NT temples
12. 4:1-5 Faithfulness is success
13. 4:6-13 The logic of humility
14. 4:14-17 Paul, our pattern
15. 4:18-21 A strict father
16. 5:1-8 Retribution is a Christian doctrine
17. 5:9-13 Separating from Christian sinners
18. 6:1-8 Better to lose
19. 6:9-20 Control your desires
20. 7:1-9 Marriage is good
21. 7:10-16 Can Christians divorce?
22. 7:17-24 Romantically content
23. 7:25-38 Focused relationships
24. 7:39-40 Bound until death
25. 8:1-13 When it is sin to eat
26. 9:1-7 Refusing privilege
27. 9:8-14 Pay the pastor
28. 9:19-23 All things to all men
29. 9:24-27 Christian athletes
30. 10:1-11 What to do with the OT
31. 10:12-13 Resisting attack
32. 10:14-22 Separation from sin
33. 10:23-30 A Christian conscience
34. 10:31-33 God-glorifying evangelism
35. 11:1-16 Women in worship
36. 11:17-34 The gospel in food
37. 12:1-11 Everyone has a gift
38. 12:12-26 Working together
39. 12:27-31 Coveting the best gifts
40. 13:1-3 Love vs. all other religious activity
41. 13:4-7 What is love?
42. 13:8-13 Love will never end
43. 14:1-19 Speaking in tongues
44. 14:20-40 The rules for tongues
45. 15:1-11 The message that drove Paul
46. 15:12-19 Why the Resurrection matters
47. 15:20-28 The resurrection made a King
48. 15:29-34 Applying the resurrection
49. 15:35-53 Our new bodies
50. 15:54-58 Why we should persevere
51. 16:1-4 How Christians give
52. 16:5-24 How Paul says goodbye
53. 1-16 A problem church’s hope
Once when I was a student, I recall seeing a church sign for “First Corinthian Baptist Church.” I don’t think I’ll be renaming our church, but as I read the letter I am growing to respect its wisdom and love its Author.
Propositions are critically important, but not all knowledge is propositional.
Unlike science, culture is not a repository of factual information or theoretical truth, nor is it a kind of training in skills, whether rhetorical or practical. Yet it is a source of knowledge: emotional knowledge, concerning what to do and what to feel. … Every culture therefore has its roots in religion, and from this root the sap of moral knowledge spreads through all the branches of speculation and art.
Roger Scruton, Culture Counts
For every careless saint who burns himself out and breaks up his family with misdirected zeal, I venture, there are a thousand who coast with the world, treating Jesus like a helpful add-on, but not as an all-satisfying, all-authoritative King in the cause of love.
John Piper, Don’t Waste Your Life, 118
First of all, I would like to publicly take my stand obeying texts like Romans 16:17 to mark and avoid those who change the gospel. That is an entire category of texts, not just an isolated example. Paul says similar things in Galatians 1, and 1 Timothy 1. Peter, John, and Jude all address these issues in their epistles–even when John only has about a dozen verses worth of material in his second epistle. And of course our Lord had the strongest words (Matt. 7:21-23) for those who twist the gospel by means of charismatic phenomena and personality. So, let it be clearly said that false teachers are repeatedly gaining acceptance in the Christian church especially in the developing world, and they are doing so under the guise of a charismatic renewal. With my whole heart I oppose these false teachers and desire to bring to bear every gift that God gives me for the clarity of the gospel in opposition to those who deceive the poor of the world.
Secondly, the gist of MacArthur’s book is a call for giving the Bible its rightful place–restoring doctrine to a central position in the lives of God’s people. I can happily agree with the great majority of material presented at the conference and in the book. I pray that God will purify His church by causing charlatans and those who love the sensational to love Christ more than the flashy attractions of their eyes.
Using spiritual gifts in such a way that practically the canon of Scripture is reopened and a wild-eyed love for unbiblical sensationalism are having devestating effects within the church, and I, for one, am glad that John MacArthur had the Christian guts to take another unpopular stand for the truth of Scripture.
Ultimately, I disagree with him on his exegesis of prophecy and the definition of the gift of tongues, but if these gifts are held within the clear parameters of Scripture then a worship service that I would be involved with would be very much like those where MacArthur would feel comfortable with. The terrible errors of the prosperity preachers and the wolves in sheep’s clothing as well as the ignorant but well-meaning attitudes of lesser known pastors and churches are long overdue for a firm Biblical corrective. As has been said, the influence of Reformed charismatics is far less in the broader evangelical world than the “uprooted trees” of the charismatic mainstream ministers. Since the errors are so egregious and so popular, I happily lay my relatively minor disagreements to the side, and as such, I wholeheartedly endorse the major message at the conference and in the book in hopes that every charismatic Christian would rejoice when the Bible is given its rightful position of absolute authority.
____________________
That is the message he should have sent. But unfortunately John Piper did not write that.
The way in which we reason, how we evaluate claims to the truth, the standards we adopt for knowing, etc.–is itself an ethical matter. …
A person cannot have it both ways regarding his final standard or ultimate reference point. He presupposes and reasons either according to the authority of God or according to some other authority. Attempting to be neutral about God’s ultimate authority in determining what we know is a result of a bad attitude toward God’s ultimate authority.
Greg Bahnsen, Van Til’s Apologetic, 90, 92
I asked 6 young men in our church a few questions while we were digging last Saturday:
1. “Did you live with or have a consistent relationship with your father growing up?”
All 6 said no.
2. “Did your father make a significant impact in helping you to grow up?”
All 6 said no.
3. “Who would you look to as an example of a respectable man in your life–the kind of man that you might want to be like? Maybe he is not a believer, but at least he is dependable. Is there any man in your life that you admire?”
One: my unsaved brother because he supports me and my mom.
One: my unsaved uncle.
The other 4 said no.
Either fatherhood is not important, or we should expect a society where this is common to exemplify a history-making train wreck.
Jeremiah Burrows on God’s calling:
The work of grace, when it is first wrought, has the name “vocation” or “calling.” What is it for a man to be called? “Give diligence to make your calling and election sure.” To be called is this: whereas before you were altogether digging and delving in the earth and seeking for your happiness in the world, it pleased God to make you hear a voice behind you, calling you and telling you, “O poor soul, your happiness is not here. There are other things in which the Chief Good consists. …” Here’s the first work of grace. And the soul answers unto this call of God and says, “Lord, I come.”
In keeping with this doctrine, I often pray for myself and those in our church that God would give them new desires.
While on our most recent furlough with access to unlimited data, I downloaded the messages from the first T4G conference. Slowly, I’ve been working through each of them, and today I arrived at my second chance to hear Ligon Duncan teach us about preaching Christ from the Old Testament.
His message was a textbook example of powerfully convincing the already convinced. He referenced preaching Christ from 2 Samuel 7 with the Davidic Covenant; preaching Christ from Isaiah 6 which is also mentioned in John 12:41; and preaching Christ from the Protoevangelium in Genesis 3:15. Now, I would not critique his interpretation of any of those passages, but I do question who would disagree with those? Rare would be the pastor who cares about the Bible, yet refuses to make the connection with Jesus Christ in those passages.
The Bible is filled with many other difficult passages for someone with a Christ-centered perspective on preaching. How do we accurately draw our people’s affections to Christ when preaching on OT narrative like the Israelites who died for looking in the Ark at Bethshemesh in 1 Samuel 6? Or two chapters later when Samuel’s wicked sons are appointed as judges?
It would have been helpful to have heard Dr. Duncan treat passages like these and offer insights and principles by which a pastor could exalt Christ without lifting stories from their original context. And it would have been great to have heard him address the kind of questions I could just imagine John MacArthur (who was in the crowd when Duncan was speaking) would ask: “If I merely preach what the text says without looking for a road to Christ that is not explicitly there, have I failed as a preacher?”
But he neither asked nor answered these questions. Though he did refer to numerous times that the NT says, “This is that” which was spoken by the prophets. As far as I know, there are only two times time when Scripture says something like this (Acts 2:16 and John 6:58).
For several reasons which I’ve already published, I want to be Christ-centered in my preaching. But that does not mean that I am able to interpret all the kinds of passages in Scripture. How nice to have had Ligon Duncan’s help!