An Apologetic for Evangelizing Children

IMG_1655In the business of pastoral ministry, how many pastors invest time in child evangelism? Probably, the majority of pastors would count on their Sunday School and children’s ministries to evangelize their children. After all, most churches have numerous services, programs, and members to care for, and the pastor and elders could not take first hand concern for every category of ministry. Nor should they since Ephesians 4 directs the leaders to equip the members to take active roles in the life of the church.

Yet possibly pastors should think about children more than they do. Consider that John Newton taught children in his church. Though he was a well-known pastor, he made time weekly at least for several years to instruct the young ones in his church. Isaac Watts wrote a book of hymns, a book of prayers, and a catechism all for children. Each of these gained a wide circulation, but they were originally written for the members of the church. No one could argue that Spurgeon had a light administrative load, yet he too wrote and edited a catechism for his church’s use.

It is common to hear people refer to children as the easiest mission field to reach since their natural state receives instruction more readily before they have been calloused by years. This is true, but many times children grow up and leave the faith raising questions about whether an adequate foundation was laid when they were still saplings. Of course, the church can place the responsibility squarely on the parents where it belongs, but do all the children have Christian parents? Even for those who do (like my children), I want them to receive as much clear, accurate, persuasive instruction about the gospel as can be mustered between church and home.

In January 2014, owing to the example of four different African men in four different villages (all graduates of our college) as well as a comment by John Piper in one his annual biographies, I began a weekly children’s evangelism class in our village. For the first 7 weeks we have averaged about 15 children from 6-13 years old who come for about 45 minutes of Scripture memory and catechisms. Last week I drew the picture below (which is becoming a favorite evangelistic tool) and 4 of them responded thoughtfully that they were at position 2, near conversion.

In the context of a churchplant, child evangelism provides a plethora of seeds that can grow into future trees. Furthermore, if the church is being planted among a poorer culture, it may be a long term project taking a decade or more in which time 12 year olds can become young adults. My experience has been that so few adults have been interested, that children are our best hope for a Bible-centered church.

Pastors who involve themselves in children’s evangelism may also find the blessing of humility since it is not a very prestigious position to instruct the youngest. Those who are in authority in the church must be clothed with humility, and most of us need every tool possible to reap a good crop of that fruit of the Spirit.

Finally, as in the case of the three men referenced earlier, pastors are usually the most skilled members of the congregation in theology and evangelism. Is your church’s curriculum and method strong in presenting the doctrinal glory of Christianity? Does it ground the children in the gospel or in the bare facts of the Old Testament?

The Baptists are right regarding the mode and subjects of baptism. Yet the paedobaptists have taught me one thing: When we evangelize our children, let us use long term methods that are saturated with doctrine so that the little ones will be grounded in the gospel without being either unduly coerced into superficial professions.

Posted in Missions, Pastoral, Soulwinning | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Economic Principles for Children

As I have grappled with how to minister with poverty all around me, here are some principles that I have compiled from many different sources. Our college graduates have received them as well as the young people in our youth group. The earthy wording–both loose enough to use and solid enough to convey the truth–is not intended for critical review, but it should put the economic cookies on a lower shelf.

1.    God gave us money to show that money is not our god, God is our God.
2.    Wealth can be created.
3.    The government cannot create wealth; only businesses can create wealth.
4.    The earth has enough wealth for everyone if people want to work to create it.
5.    Wealth grows slowly. It takes several generations for a nation to become wealthy.
6.    Work is good.
7.    Men have to learn how to work because we are all naturally lazy.
8.    If fathers teach their children to work hard, the country can be rich.
9.    The gospel of Jesus Christ should make us hard workers.
10.    Christians should never waste time, effort, money, tools, or knowledge.
11.    We can create wealth more quickly if we learn and use logic.
12.    Prices are set by all the businesses trying to sell more than the other businesses.
13.    When government controls prices, it makes other things more expensive.
14.    A smaller government is better for the economy than a larger one.
15.    Poverty comes from sin, lack of tools, and natural disasters.
16.    Sin is the greatest cause of poverty.
17.    Of all the sins, laziness creates poverty the most quickly.
18.    Tools can create wealth quickly.
19.    Since man is sinful, the government should not give money to poor people.
20.    If a sinner gets money from the government, he will learn to avoid work.
21.    God owns everything, but He loans it to man for a little while.
22.    Christian men provide for the needs of their wives and children.
23.    Biblical fatherhood has an immediate and powerful impact on the economy.
24.    Christians should give their money generously, happily, and wisely.
25.    Every church should provide for its own pastor, missionaries, and widows.
26.    Self-control is the greatest key to handling finances.
27.    Saving a little money for a long time is the best way to get what you want.
28.    Don’t spend money if you don’t have it.
29.    Many companies tempt Christians to break the 10th commandment.
30.    Money can make us happier in eternity, if we spend it well.

Posted in Lists, Pastoral | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

Shifting the Standard for Fathers

One of the central qualifications for a father in a congregation is that he be able to demonstrate for the people what a godly, effective father can do in the home. Instead of this, we have decided to substitute three years of graduate study.

Doug Wilson, Father Hunger

Posted in Quotes | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

What Ken Ham Should Have Said to Bill Nye

In one of his rebuttals or his closing statement, it would have been refreshing to hear an Elijah mock the prophets of Baal.

____________________

Mr. Nye, I’ve heard you reference Creationism with words like “extraordinary” and even faux surprise as if you could not fathom the foolishness of a mind that would hold to a literal, six day Creation by an omnipotent God as is recorded in the Bible.

Yet textbooks across our nation commonly teach that the Big Bang happened 14 billion years ago followed by a rock forming over the next 10 billion years or so. Life then sprang from this rock when water from some fantastic source chanced to fall upon it.

So, all life that we see today came from a rock. Consciousness, personality, spiritual entities like the laws of logic, morality, and science, maternal love, the pleasure we feel when we do good, information in cells—and we have not even mentioned irreducibly complex systems like blood clotting, the nervous system, and reproduction—all of these immaterial realities of life came from a rock.

That is what you believe. We came from a rock. Everything we see in this room from the people to the live streaming internet to our own eyeballs, came from a rock. Now, I like you as a person, and I would be glad to have you as a neighbor, but that particular belief can only be looked at honestly as a kind of insanity.

And you have the boldness to call the view extraordinary that says that an all-powerful, infinite Person could create a complex world? Again, I like you, and I want to be gracious toward you, but that conclusion is ridiculous.

The only possible way I can explain obviously intelligent people holding to that view is that they must really hate the God who makes my view both possible and necessary. And interestingly enough, that is exactly what John 7:7 says, “The world hates me [Jesus Christ].” Paul and Peter make some similar comments in their writings, so it would appear that the real divide between us is something in the heart rather than the head.

I mean, a rock over an infinite Person? Mr. Nye, you’ve got to rethink this one.

_____________________

I know in a dialogue you have to think on your feet, but he could have prepared a few slides on that theme and had them waiting for the finale or something. As far as the potential complaint that this little speech is not “nice,” let’s not forget that it is true, it could be said graciously, and we are in far greater danger of trying to be too nice, than too bold. What would a John Knox have said?

Posted in Hypothetically speaking | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

An Open Letter to Spurgeon’s Church

There is gold all around us, yet it stands in unexpected places. When my colleague reviewed The Forgotten Spurgeon by Murray, it prompted me to check out the book that has been waiting on my shelves. Murray titles should not wait too long. And what gold had been stored up for me there? Why as so often happens, a great appendix.

In 11 pages Charles Noble, a church member living about 25 years after Spurgeon’s death, takes the then-current Pastor, Deacons, and Elders to task for not following the constitution of the church. If you own the book, go read the Appendix as this church member raises some important issues for all churches.

The author’s frustration could be summarized in two headings. First, unethical treatment of interpersonal relationships. Secondly, the introduction of revivalism to the church.

From a relationship perspective, it is sometimes shocking to me to see Christians who are known to be faithful in certain areas ignore the most basic rules of the faith in conversation and relationships. The fruit of the Spirit is patience, kindness, and gentleness which goes perfectly with Christ’s Golden Rule in Matthew 7:12. But the serpent can slither into an unguarded crack in the life of an otherwise committed Christian. Or, maybe more transparently, he slips into the unguarded cracks of all our lives. It is interesting that this kind of sin found its way into such a famous church with such a well-known pastor.

But the second concern was even more interesting—if not quite so devotional. I summarize his concerns as revivalism, or the idea that men can work up a movement of God’s Spirit. As usual the trouble is with the “-ism” since every believer should love true revival. Possibly because it goes hand in hand with the can-do, pragmatic American ethos, American Christianity has been indelibly marked by revivalism. So numbers at church services, statistics from church programs, increases in income, and total number of “decisions made” serve as the measuring sticks of success. After all, we need some way to gauge our work, and saying, “I preached 120 accurate sermons last year,” doesn’t sound that impressive.

What fascinated me was that, the fourth pastor after Spurgeon, A. C. Dixon was an American, and the frustration that Noble expressed fell chiefly on him. In the letter, he charges the current leadership with abdicating the constitution written by Spurgeon some 60 years earlier because that document required both the pastor and the church members to be Calvinistic.

Furthermore, Dixon introduced the “Tithe” to the church which Spurgeon had opposed as being part of the law that was done away. Not only did he urge tithing on the church members, but he also took offerings at each service—a first for that church. Tithes and offerings do not have to be tainted with a man-centered ideology, but if a man already saw himself as the primary catalyst for a great work of God, though none would say it so crassly, the temptation would gnaw on him like the Ring on Gollum.

Noble disliked the other programs that were new to what had been the largest Baptist church in the world. He specifically indicts using “worldly instruments, concerts, soloists, and the purse of rich but worldly men” and “the holding up of hands after every service, which was an effort to hustle people into making some sort of profession of faith and desire to come into the Church, so as to look like doing wonders in the way of conversions and additions.” Rather than preaching the gospel with power and boldness as had been done during Spurgeon’s unprecedented days of evangelism, the church was trying to work up a fair show in the flesh. Amazingly, the Metropolitan Tabernacle was shrinking while using these methods when it had expanded with the Whitefieldian methods of Spurgeon.

The author of the letter saw that the doctrines of grace did not spawn programs to “hurry things up a bit” (a phrase actually used by Dixon in defense of his American innovations).

I find all of these reflections particularly remarkable since the Metropolitan Tabernacle was a model of an evangelistic church. During Spurgeons’ days, they held prayer meetings and constantly baptized new converts without the aids that sometimes are deemed vital to the task.

Don’t misunderstand what Noble was saying: a return to the gospel that Jesus and Peter preached would not guarantee that great numbers of people would be saved like before, but it would guarantee that the church was faithful and that those who responded would be much more likely to be genuine believers.

All this and more from an open letter 96 years old. Go read it.

Posted in Book reviews, Orthopathy, Pastoral | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Kindling Steel

The anger of a meek man is like fire struck out of steel, hard to be got out, but when it is out, soon gone.

Matthew Henry, The Quest for Meekness and Quietness of Spirit

Posted in Pastoral, Quotes | Leave a comment

First Corinthians in Bite-sized Portions

Last Lord’s Day I began working through 1 Corinthians. Here is the path we hope to trod over the next year or so.
Purpose statement:
•    A correction of relational, sexual, ecclesiastical, and theological problems that all churches might face

1.    Acts 18:1-11    God saves people with problems.
2.    1:1-9    What to say before a rebuke
3.    1:10-16    Politics in the church
4.    1:17-25    An intellectual battle
5.    1:26-31    God chooses unlikely things
6.    2:1-5    Solus Christus in the pulpit
7.    2:6-16    Total inability
8.    3:1-4    Carnal Christians
9.    3:5-9    Christianity as farming
10.    3:10-15    Building for a reward
11.    3:16-23    NT temples
12.    4:1-5    Faithfulness is success
13.    4:6-13    The logic of humility
14.    4:14-17    Paul, our pattern
15.    4:18-21    A strict father
16.    5:1-8    Retribution is a Christian doctrine
17.    5:9-13    Separating from Christian sinners
18.    6:1-8    Better to lose
19.    6:9-20    Control your desires
20.    7:1-9    Marriage is good
21.    7:10-16    Can Christians divorce?
22.    7:17-24    Romantically content
23.    7:25-38    Focused relationships
24.    7:39-40    Bound until death
25.    8:1-13    When it is sin to eat
26.    9:1-7    Refusing privilege
27.    9:8-14    Pay the pastor
28.    9:19-23    All things to all men
29.    9:24-27    Christian athletes
30.    10:1-11    What to do with the OT
31.    10:12-13    Resisting attack
32.    10:14-22    Separation from sin
33.    10:23-30    A Christian conscience
34.    10:31-33    God-glorifying evangelism
35.    11:1-16    Women in worship
36.    11:17-34    The gospel in food
37.    12:1-11    Everyone has a gift
38.    12:12-26    Working together
39.    12:27-31    Coveting the best gifts
40.    13:1-3    Love vs. all other religious activity
41.    13:4-7    What is love?
42.    13:8-13    Love will never end
43.    14:1-19    Speaking in tongues
44.    14:20-40    The rules for tongues
45.    15:1-11    The message that drove Paul
46.    15:12-19    Why the Resurrection matters
47.    15:20-28    The resurrection made a King
48.    15:29-34    Applying the resurrection
49.    15:35-53    Our new bodies
50.    15:54-58    Why we should persevere
51.    16:1-4    How Christians give
52.    16:5-24    How Paul says goodbye
53.    1-16    A problem church’s hope

Once when I was a student, I recall seeing a church sign for “First Corinthian Baptist Church.” I don’t think I’ll be renaming our church, but as I read the letter I am growing to respect its wisdom and love its Author.

Posted in Book reviews, Hermeneutics, Pastoral | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

How Culture Teaches

Propositions are critically important, but not all knowledge is propositional.

Unlike science, culture is not a repository of factual information or theoretical truth, nor is it a kind of training in skills, whether rhetorical or practical. Yet it is a source of knowledge: emotional knowledge, concerning what to do and what to feel. … Every culture therefore has its roots in religion, and from this root the sap of moral knowledge spreads through all the branches of speculation and art.

Roger Scruton, Culture Counts

Posted in Orthopathy, Quotes | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Our Real Danger

For every careless saint who burns himself out and breaks up his family with misdirected zeal, I venture, there are a thousand who coast with the world, treating Jesus like a helpful add-on, but not as an all-satisfying, all-authoritative King in the cause of love.

John Piper, Don’t Waste Your Life, 118

Posted in Orthopathy, Pastoral, Quotes | 1 Comment

How John Piper Should Have Responded to John MacArthur

First of all, I would like to publicly take my stand obeying texts like Romans 16:17 to mark and avoid those who change the gospel. That is an entire category of texts, not just an isolated example. Paul says similar things in Galatians 1, and 1 Timothy 1. Peter, John, and Jude all address these issues in their epistles–even when John only has about a dozen verses worth of material in his second epistle. And of course our Lord had the strongest words (Matt. 7:21-23) for those who twist the gospel by means of charismatic phenomena and personality. So, let it be clearly said that false teachers are repeatedly gaining acceptance in the Christian church especially in the developing world, and they are doing so under the guise of a charismatic renewal. With my whole heart I oppose these false teachers and desire to bring to bear every gift that God gives me for the clarity of the gospel in opposition to those who deceive the poor of the world.

Secondly, the gist of MacArthur’s book is a call for giving the Bible its rightful place–restoring doctrine to a central position in the lives of God’s people. I can happily agree with the great majority of material presented at the conference and in the book. I pray that God will purify His church by causing charlatans and those who love the sensational to love Christ more than the flashy attractions of their eyes.

Using spiritual gifts in such a way that practically the canon of Scripture is reopened and a wild-eyed love for unbiblical sensationalism are having devestating effects within the church, and I, for one, am glad that John MacArthur had the Christian guts to take another unpopular stand for the truth of Scripture.

Ultimately, I disagree with him on his exegesis of prophecy and the definition of the gift of tongues, but if these gifts are held within the clear parameters of Scripture then a worship service that I would be involved with would be very much like those where MacArthur would feel comfortable with. The terrible errors of the prosperity preachers and the wolves in sheep’s clothing as well as the ignorant but well-meaning attitudes of lesser known pastors and churches are long overdue for a firm Biblical corrective. As has been said, the influence of Reformed charismatics is far less in the broader evangelical world than the “uprooted trees” of the charismatic mainstream ministers. Since the errors are so egregious and so popular, I happily lay my relatively minor disagreements to the side, and as such, I wholeheartedly endorse the major message at the conference and in the book in hopes that every charismatic Christian would rejoice when the Bible is given its rightful position of absolute authority.

____________________

That is the message he should have sent. But unfortunately John Piper did not write that.

Posted in Hypothetically speaking, Pastoral, Prosperity gospel | Tagged , , , , , , | 4 Comments